Talk:Red Ventures
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 14 November 2020. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Older comments
Red Ventures is no longer located in Charlotte, North Carolina.
In 2009, Red Ventures relocated to the 521 Corporate Center, in northern Lancaster County, South Carolina.
Jbaker314 (talk) 03:22, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Article updated 27 May, 2010 to reflect changes in the business. Red Ventures no longer sells Sirius_Satellite_Radio, so that link was removed. Added links for HughesNet, Clear 4G WiMax, and Miracle-Ear, which are all new clients added since the previous update. Offices in Dallas, Texas and New York City have been closed.
Rturnham (talk) 18:40, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
deleted content
Hello, I would like to discuss the inclusion of recognition and rankings which were recently deleted. (See diffs 794593612 and 794644674 ) The edit summary stated "very promotional", presumably implying the content violated WP policy regarding advertising. I disagree that the content meets the definition of promotional/advertising, and I strongly object to the deletion of content without discussion. However, I would like to find a consensus of what, if any, content should be included.
I believe the following should be retained in the article
- The rankings of the company and it's growth rate are very relevant to the company's history and should be included. (refs: [1][2][3][4])
- The awards/recognition should be retained in the corporate culture section. Perhaps the added sentence: Correspondingly, Red Ventures has been repeatedly recognized by Charlotte based newspapers for it's corporate culture.[5][6][7][8][9]
I look forward to the discussion. Dbsseven (talk) 16:23, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
References
- ^ http://www.redventures.com/images/pdf/rv_presskit_aug08.pdf
- ^ “Inc. 500: America’s Fastest Growing Private Companies”, Inc. Magazine, September 2007
- ^ “Inc. 500: America’s Fastest Growing Private Companies”, Inc. Magazine, November 1, 2004
- ^ “Inc. 500: America’s Fastest Growing Private Companies”, Inc. Magazine, September 2008
- ^ "Red Ventures on the Forbes America's Best Midsize Employers List". Forbes. Retrieved 2017-03-06.
- ^ "Charlotte's Best Places to Work 2011", Charlotte Business Journal, November 10, 2011
- ^ "Charlotte's Best Places to Work 2010", Charlotte Business Journal, November 4, 2010
- ^ ”Companies honored as Best Places to Work”, Charlotte Business Journal, November 5, 2008
- ^ "Large companies, No. 1 - Red Ventures: Benefits and career chances stand out". charlotteobserver. Retrieved 2017-03-06.
Request edit on 20 October 2022
 | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
- Remove Chowhound from list of brands owned and operated by Red Ventures:
- Chowhound was closed down in March 2022:
- New York Times ([1]):
Mcmurtrk (talk) 16:17, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
References
- ^ Asimov, Eric (3/10/22). "Chowhound Closes After 25 Years of Food Obsession, Wisdom and Debate". New York Times. Retrieved 10/20/22.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|access-date=and|date=(help)
Information about Wikipedia itself sourced externally
Information about Wikipedia changing Red Ventures from trusted to untrusted in citations is weirdly cited only to an external site claiming that this happened . There's no citation or link to that alleged decision within a Wikimedia foundation website .
This looks suspect . 77.213.208.88 (talk) 11:44, 3 March 2024 (UTC)