Talk:Reason

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Reason article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 90 days

Philosophy: Epistemology / Logic / Ethics High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Epistemology
	Logic
	Ethics

Articlle issues and classification

Article fails the B-class criteria #1 with a 2016 "citation needed" tag. Reassess to C-class. There are many unsourced sentences, paragraphs, and subsections. Reassess to C-class. Other issues: The Article lead is bloated with six paragraphs. -- Otr500 (talk) 05:27, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Reason

Articlle issues and classification

Navigation menu

Search