Talk:Ready To Wait campaign

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

POV

The article seems to be heavily biassed in favour of those who support the campaign, which itself seems to be just another one-day wonder on Twitter. Be careful here because Wikipedia is not a soapbox. - Sitush (talk) 13:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sitush, why we can't just merge this to Entry of women to Sabarimala Ayyappa Temple ? Seems to be a CFORK. WBGconverse 07:26, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
{{|Winged Blades of Godric}}: Seems like it might be a good idea. You'd need to set up a formal discussion. Ping me if you do - I missed the ping below because I wasn't very active at the time. - Sitush (talk) 07:37, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Winged Blades of Godric: - repinging. - Sitush (talk) 07:38, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We mention #RightToPray with no context whatsoever, which makes the articles look lop-sided and smacks of some sort of Hindutva row.- Sitush (talk) 13:25, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sitush: Please feel free to add the context for #RightToPray. With regards to #ReadyToWait being a "one-day" wonder, the campaigners were made party in the Supreme Court petition on the issue which is unprecedented for social media activismCite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page).. - Regards, Gayatri 23:20, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Removing the NPOV tag for the following reasons:

  • The discussion has become dormant. Original comment was published over a year ago. No response to the clarification for nearly two months.
  • A lot has happened for the campaign since 2017.
  • Have partially addressed the concerns by changing the language and adding more references and citations. Gayatri — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gayatri9876 (talkcontribs) 05:53, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]