Talk:Rational consequence relation

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Philosophy: Logic Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic

RMO generalizes CMO ?

It seems to me that rule RMO ${\frac {p\vdash r\quad \quad p\not \vdash \lnot q}{p\land q\vdash r}}$ is a generalization of rule CMO ${\frac {p\vdash r\quad \quad p\vdash q}{p\land q\vdash r}}$ . For, if $p\vdash q$ holds, then, assuming consistency, $p\not \vdash \lnot q$ also holds. Therefore, I wonder why both rules are required. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 15:57, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Rational consequence relation

RMO generalizes CMO ?

Navigation menu

Search