Talk:Raphe

Anatomy: Meta Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to The field of anatomy.

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animal anatomy Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Animal anatomy, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to animal anatomy apart from human anatomy. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Animal anatomy. This project is an offshoot of WikiProject AnimalsAnimal anatomyWikipedia:WikiProject Animal anatomyTemplate:WikiProject Animal anatomyAnimal anatomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Clean-up

What do people think needs to be done here? It doesn't meet MOS:D guidelines at the moment, especially as the entries are lengthy and there are more than 1 blue link on each line. It reads to me more like a dictionary definition, but I'm unsure if any entries are invalid. What do others think? Boleyn3 (talk) 13:49, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed it to a set index article. Station1 (talk) 16:35, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Raphe

Clean-up

Navigation menu

Search