That's how we should go ahead– slowly but steadily.
I'll keep on adding points as I'll go.
Active participation of nominator and primary contributors of this article will be highly appreciated.
If no one joins the review discussion, after waiting for 7–12 days, I'll assess the current version and will try to to finish the review quickly by adding all the points.
B) For article editors
Add {{Done}} etc templates below when you have completed a requested task! Similarly you can add {{Not done}} etc! See more similar templates.
It is requested not to use Strikethrough in this GA review page to show that a task has been completed (optional).
If you see I (reviewer) is not active in the review discussion, please send me a message in my talk page to ping me!
C) Contacting reviewer
You can contact reviewer any time during the review!
Google Plus (experimental) If you don't want to post some private comment in Wikipedia talk page/review page and also don't want to reveal your email address to me, you can contact me in Google Plus.
I have been experimenting with this importance marker. I first tried this in Talk:Independence Day (India)/GA1. Please concentrate specially on those issues which have been marked of High importance. Multiple unsolved and/or unanswered High important issues can lead to result GA fail.
Section 01
Additional citation needed
Importance:High
Legend section!
Done
Image alt
Importance:Med
Add image alt in at least few images, see WP:ALT for details!
I had a very quick look. I think we are seeing a mixture of cite web and no template (but in effect Harvard style) inline citations here (the no template but in effect Harvard style is being followed for book references). Mixture of citation styles may not be a problem for GA (so far as I know); but if you eventually target FA, this would be a problem. However, I am not cent percent sure in this regard. To be on the safe side, you may consider re-doing the references, to make consistent use of some specific pattern. Safest (not necessarily the best) would be to use some form of templates rather than non-template citations. You can ask for a second opinion/third opinion.--Dwaipayan (talk) 05:04, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In addition if Harvard ref style is followed, particular pages should not be linked "Notes" (source) section (this is mainly practised for cite book) !--Tito Dutta✉05:39, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I followed as in Ganesha, where books are quoted as refs and web/news are inline and come as notes. The reference section holds all the books to ease editing. Also all web references are in templates, while book ones are linked in reference section(the actual page where reference is found rather than the book link). Let me know for thoughtsSsriram mt (talk) 22:46, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm... I see even the FA version of Ganesha has some inconsistencies. That FAC was in 2007; I guess the FA candidacy is more strict now. I am going to ask Redtigerxyz (primary author of Ganesha) for commenting here. IMO, Ahalya has the ideal consistent us of Harvard style. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 23:53, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have seen that the style "books are quoted as refs and web/news are inline and come as notes" on many articles earlier, but this style is not in much use now.--RedtigerxyzTalk03:44, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
See the article India as well for reference style help, if you are going to follow Harvard style consistently. We just recently converted the reference style to Harvard style (using sfn) in the article Mother India.--Dwaipayan (talk) 01:31, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I will complete it in a day or two. Just to maintain sanity, i am doing it in my sandbox - will periodically update the article to have sanity. Ssriram mt (talk) 00:03, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"The Missile Man Of India" Dr.APJ Abdul Kalam was born. – can not see anywhere other than lead. Unsourced. You can change to A. P. J. Abdul Kalam and link it.
Done - puppet edit, removed.
Not very important, but still if possible add citation for along with other major broadband internet service providers like Tata VSNL, Bharti and Reliance. --Tito Dutta✉14:18, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Per Template:Commonscat– Do not place this template in a section containing columns. not a major issue. Still if possible fix it. Currently there is not any external link section. If you can add 1–2 relevant EL, you can place the template there! --Tito Dutta✉01:19, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]