This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
23:22, 26 October 2012 (UTC)ProfMadProfmad (talk) 23:22, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
RTI-31:- The material acquired was from a reliable source. The supply quickly went quiet?
250mg was tested over a 24 hour period. It had little, to no anaesthetic quality. Effects noticeable at 5mg doses, and extrememy euphoric by sublingual ad. A longer t1/2 than Cocaine, and preferable!
I doubt it will reliably reappear, since, it is a highly habituating substance.
Some forums suggest the materials tested was not RTI-1, with 'peculiar' recounts, since its effects are potently obvious. 23:22, 26 October 2012 (UTC)ProfMadProfmad (talk) 23:22, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Readability
This article is very technically written (and at some points clunky in grammar) and needs language softening for general readability. An expert in pharmaceutical chemistry will need to do this. I cannot. Grammarpolicealpha (talk) 11:21, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
