Talk:Quackwatch/Use of Quackwatch as a source
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
There have been numerous RfCs and noticeboard discussions regarding the reliability of Quackwatch and its use as a source. Please make yourself familiar with them before asking related questions or starting new RfCs.
RS noticeboard discussions on Quackwatch's reliability
- QuackWatch (2007)
- Quackwatch (2007)
- Plural medicine, tradition and modernity (2008)
- Quackwatch (2008)
- Quackwatch etc (2008)
- Usage of Quackwatch as RS in medical quackery (2009)
- How can Quackwatch be considered a "reliable source"? (2010)
- Quackwatch (2012)
- Could Quackwatch, Martin Gardner and Michael Shermer be used to affirm that Rudolf Steiner was a pseudoscientist? (2013)
- Quackwatch (2013)
- Two sources in the lede of Alkaline diet (2017)
- Is Quackwatch an SPS and thus not allowed as a source on BLPs? (2019)
RS noticeboard discussion about Stephen Barrett
- Stephen Barrett (2007)
BLP noticeboard discussions about Quackwatch
- Hulda Regehr Clark (closed) (2007)
- Stephen Barrett and Quackwatch (2008)
- Noticeboards, source criticism and claims of BLP issues (2010)
- Juice Plus/John A. Wise (2011)
- BLP objections at Gabriel Cousens (2012)
- Gary Null is not a Quack or a crackpot (2013)
- Gary Null (2014)
- Gary Null (2019)
FT noticeboard discussions about Quackwatch
- Weston Price and Quackwatch (2010)
- Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (2013)
- Rosen Method Bodywork (2014)
- Quackwatch apparently not a reliable source for living people? (2019)
NPOV noticeboard discussions about Quackwatch
- Article lead seeming to attempt to exempt article from NPOV and RS. (2009)
- I tried to edit Wikipedia article on "Quackery" to be more neutral but my edit was reversed.Is Wikipedia not neutral? (2009)
- Alkaline diet (2012)
- Extreme skeptical bias at Acupuncture (2014)
Discussions at Talk:MEDRS
- Is Quackwatch a reliable source? (2015)
- Proposal to address Quackwatch by name in this guideline (2015)