Talk:Q-go

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Notability

The result of the deletion discussion (May 2013) hasn't yet been actioned. In advance of performing the merge, I thought I'd do a little research. After finding a few sources,[1][2][3][4][5][6] I'm now proposing retaining the article, which may meet WP:CORPDEPTH. (Unfortunately, I've had no success in trying to retrieve the dead link on the WSJ.) I'll leave this for a while and notify parties as appropriate over the next week or so. Cheers. -- Trevj (talk) 10:26, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I managed to forget about this, so am just sending those belated notifications now. -- Trevj (talkcontribs) 12:37, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up (sorry, was out of town). So what's the current status? I oppose a merge, for the same reason I oppose a merge of RightNow into Oracle. Maury Markowitz (talk) 22:28, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as the result was a merge rather than a delete, and because there were few participants, I'm reinstating the article, per WP:CCC. I'll try to get the references in there soon too. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 15:30, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Q-go. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:15, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]