Talk:Punctelia hypoleucites/GA1
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: FunkMonk (talk · contribs) 00:57, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, I'll have a look soon. At first glance, there's a bunch of WP:duplinks, which can be highlighted with this script:[1] FunkMonk (talk) 00:57, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- "were collected in Pico de Orizaba, Veracruz" You could mention the country here too.
- "The smaller one of them of them " Double them.
- You only present some people mentioned with occupation and nationality, should be consistent.
- Some terms are hard to understand even when linked, so though I don't like to "enforce" this, maybe they could be explained somehow ion parenthesis? For example "and lacks conidia and apothecia".
- Terms linked and explained in the intro should also be linked (and perhaps explained again) in the article body.
- Lichen could also be linked at first mention outside the intro.
- Such terms should also be linked in image captions.
- "Hildur Krog transferred" You should only need to give last name after first mention of the full name?
- "Later, P. semansiana was found to be identical with P. graminicola." Would it be relevant to mention when and by who?
- Link and explain "foliose" outside the intro too.
- "propagules such as soralia nor isidia" Explanations?
- Explain terms like medulla, sessile, hymenium, ascospores, in the article body?
- What does the specific name mean?
- The distribution seems very random, the Americas and Africa, any theories of how this came to be?
- Is this UK or US English? You use inconsistent spellings, both color and colour.
- Seems a bit unbalanced that you go into so much detail about which Mexican states it is found in when this is not done with other countries mentioned.