Talk:Population Connection

This article on Population Connection seems very weak and vague. The very few sources that are listed on this article seem to all be from their website or a similar primary source. It's worded almost directly from their website and the parts that aren't seem to just be someone's voice or opinions. Despite the lack of citations and neutrality, there seems to be a lack of content on this article's page as well. They list their campaigns and contributions but they don't intentionally explain each one. Adding to the campaign page and going over some of the sources could be a good start, and appropriating the citations as well as adding some neutral language will help elevate this article. Bsteele01 (talk) 00:54, 28 April 2017 (UTC)Brendan Steele

Untitled

What about the concept of zero population growth itself? Surely that should have its own article. xxxyyyzzz 16:39, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

It's covered indirectly at population control. -Will Beback 20:57, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Funny there's no mention of the "stop at two" slogan ZPG used to forward. One of the only things I directly remember from the time

External links

• Stop Terrible Human Over Population Disasters (eCards website to limit human population growth)
• WiseArt Cybernetics (On-line artistic slideshow about limiting human population growth)

Hallo Joyous! I have a question about your message: You ask me not to add inappropriate external links to wikipedia. When I compare the 2 links I added to other existing external links on certain webpages, I see that the 'appropriate' links (i.e the ones you leave alone), are also links to external -third party- organisations, such as our European organisation (STHOPD) is too. Our non-profit organisation works with volunteers and stands for certain principles which are similar to the 'appropriate' organisations on the webpages concerned, such as: Decreasing human overpopulation in an ethical way, having no children, warnings about the worldwide consequences of overpopulation such as the destruction of ecosystems. Please explain to me what would make our links appropriate. Friendly regards, 213.84.166.83 18:22, 21 January 2007 (UTC) MetaMouse.