Talk:Pollinator garden

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Wiki Education assignment: Content Area Literacy

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 August 2022 and 3 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ECAR314, Brandymcwhorter (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Brandymcwhorter (talk) 03:57, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed bibliography

This is my proposed bibliography for updating this article:

Aizen, M.A., Garibaldi, L.A., Cunningham, S.A., & Klein, A.M. (2009). How much does agriculture depend on pollinators? Lessons from long-term trends in crop production. Annals of Botany, 103(9), 1579–1588. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp076

Fukase, J., & Simons, A. M. (2016). Increased pollinator activity in urban gardens with more native flora. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 14(1), 297-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1401_297310

Knepp, T. (2011). Attracting pollinators to your garden. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. https://permanent.fdlp.gov/gpo58962/Attracting_Pollinators_to_Your_Garden.pdf

National Research Council. (2007). Status of Pollinators in North America. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11761

Root, P. (2014). Plant a Pocket of Prairie. The University of Minnesota Press.

Wessel, M. (2021, August 13). Ready to join the butterfly garden movement? Toronto Sun. https://torontosun.com/life/homes/ready-to-join-the-butterfly-garden-movement ECAR314 (talk) 20:30, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 06:55, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by ECAR314 (talk). Self-nominated at 02:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]

  • Hi ECAR314, thanks for nominating this article but it is not currently eligible for DYK as the expansion in text length (measured from this pre-existing revision) is not sufficient. I measure it as just over doubling in length while the rules require a 5x expansion. I don't think it is feasible for the article to reach the required length. A more achievable route to DYK appearance might be to improve it to Wikipedia:Good article standard, once this is achieved it also grants DYK eligibility - Dumelow (talk) 08:24, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • @ECAR314: If you nominate this page for GA, I'll review it. See Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 07:47, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]