Talk:Phonehenge West

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (I'm not done! I just started creating it and applying my sources and when I clicked preview/save it's telling me it's being deleted, wtf? Phonehenge was a giant structure that hundreds of peoopled toured every year. If Lady Gaga is on wikipedia this should be a well. This man spent 30 years constructing it and it's all over the news, why wouldn't it be in here??????) --Travisvadon1 (talk) 02:51, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Unnecessary tangent?

I won't presume to do such major editing, but isn't the detailed paragraph on Stonehenge an unnecessary tangent (not to mention, duplicated information)? Why not just explain the pun's basis and include a link to the Stonehenge page? Wouldn't a photo be invaluable here, too, as P.W. was such a visual phenomenon? (And perhaps the "Contested Deletion" entry before this one can be, er, deleted now, as the article is still here two years later. If only the same could be said for P.W. itself.) – AndyFielding (talk) 01:31, 29 December 2014 (UTC)