Talk:Philosophy of Arithmetic

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Philosophy: Literature / Logic / Continental / Modern Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Logic
	Continental philosophy
	Modern philosophy

Frege's criticism

Why isn't there anything about Frege's criticism to the Book? Many commentators consider it the most influential thing to Husserl's turning against psychologism. -- 213.6.24.69 (talk) 20:32, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Frege, Russell, and the Logic Bullies intimidated Husserl into abandoning psychological investigations. As though logic exists as a real entity completely unrelated to any thinking brain. He had no choice if he wanted to remain employed in a university. This may be of enormous importance. It certainly affected the remainder of Husserl's work.Lestrade (talk) 13:49, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Lestrade[reply]

Talk:Philosophy of Arithmetic

Frege's criticism

Navigation menu

Search