Talk:Petrus Ramus

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Philosophy: Philosophers / Logic / Medieval Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Logic
	Medieval philosophy

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ramism

The Swedish wikipedia article for Petrus Ramus clearly divides his biography from ramism, the school of thought he was the namesake of. This article mixes the two, and has no separate article for ramism. Wouldn't a clearer division be preferable? Unfortunately I know no more about ramism than I've read in the wikipedia, so I'm probably not the best person to do this. Lijil 09:22, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Date of death

According to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy link quoted, Ramus was killed not on the first but on the third day of the St Bartholomew's Day Massacre, making it at least the 26th August. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.138.189.76 (talk) 02:16, 30 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Self-referencing See also loop

In the See Also section is a link to Ramism. It redirects to this page.

Role of Dialectique in Anglo-Saxon cultural history

De la Ramée's protestant dialectics became part of the 17th century English school curriculum with the publication of Butler's The Logic of Ramus.

See Ramism for more on this. Charles Matthews (talk) 20:52, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

Is lacking in the article. Ong's views should not be the only source. Fortunately there is a great deal now written about Ramism. As it says above, there might be a case for splitting that topic out. But first the article should be cleaned up. Charles Matthews (talk) 09:17, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have now created Ramism with about 20% of what was here, as a more suitable place to discuss what happened into the 17th century. Charles Matthews (talk) 13:00, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which Cardinal of Lorraine?

I assumed John, Cardinal of Lorraine from date. A source says Charles, Cardinal of Lorraine, very young at the time (but not impossible given his rapid church promotion. Not resolved. Charles Matthews (talk) 20:54, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Leibniz and Ramism

I read on the latest academic biography of Leibniz, and I saw there that he was very much into Ramist educational philosophy, and used it extensively to guide his studies. Since Leibniz is incredibly notable, it would be interesting if some able Wikipedician (a specialist in Wikipedianism) could add that into there! Thanks! 187.64.234.98 (talk) 05:13, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Petrus Ramus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:27, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]