Talk:Perceptual robotics

Robotics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

refs

sorry for being subjective - I just have not found yet material from sources I am not linked to which of course would be welcome! Herdtien (talk) 16:16, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Moved to Perpetual robotics. Lynch 7 17:54, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perceptual Robotics → Perceptual robotics –

Per WP:MOSCAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term. Another article creator simply though we use title case. It's just a field of study. $Tony (talk)$ 06:57, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Not a proper noun and should be decapitalised accordingly. Jenks24 (talk) 10:42, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Talk:Perceptual robotics

refs

Requested move

Navigation menu

Search