Talk:People v. Marquan M.

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 8 March 2015 by reviewer Kharkiv07 (talk · contribs).

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

A fact from People v. Marquan M. appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 April 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that People v. Marquan M. was the first case in which a US court weighed the constitutionality of criminalizing cyberbullying?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/People v Marquan M..

Wikipedia

State laws regulating speech are, strictly speaking, subject to the restrictions of the 14th Amendment, not the First Amendment

Is it beating a dead horse to point this out? Terry Thorgaard (talk) 16:46, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

Congratulations on making it to today's listing on the "Did You Know..." section of Wikipedia Main Page. The process of making it the listing takes a bit of effort and involves the quick cooperation of many editors. All involved deserve recognition, appreciation, thanks and applause.

Best Regards,

Bfpage |leave a message 21:38, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:People v. Marquan M.

State laws regulating speech are, strictly speaking, subject to the restrictions of the 14th Amendment, not the First Amendment

Congratulations

Navigation menu

Search