This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article mentions the Avars but WIkipedia has two articles about Avars: Caucasian and Eurasian. To which does this article refer? Jaberwocky6669 21:56, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)
Commentaries on the Regula Benedicti
This article also fails to mention the important commentary that Paul the Deacon composed regarding the observance and practice of Benedictine monasticism. This work, usually taken as part of the Warnefrid-Hildemar commentaries, is integral to an understanding of monasticism in the Early Medieval period. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.132.195.197 (talk) 18:40, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"from a medieval manuscript"
Please don't do this. "A medieval manuscript" is, by itself, not a reference. This is being done all over the place, I have no idea why it isn't challenged more often. --dab(𒁳) 11:11, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
