Talk:Participatory action research

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2021 and 14 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jerichorajninger. Peer reviewers: Daniellesori, Allibsusss.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 06:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

This article is gobbledygook

This article was written from an ideological viewpoint that embraces postmodernism and social constructivism, which is why it's unintellible. It's also far longer than it needs to be.

Ivory tower

Does it make sense to include a link to Ivory tower in the "See also" section? I note the following changes:

• 11 July 2014, Maurice Carbonaro added the link with edit summary "Added a == See also == section with * Ivory tower"
• 6 January 2016, Dhammicmarxist removed the link with edit summary "Removed vandalism"
• 26 February 2016, Yaris678 added the link with edit summary "Undid revision 698452084 by Dhammicmarxist (talk) - I don't think it was vandalism. PAR is aiming to be the opposite of ivory tower. An interesting addition to "see also""
• 1 March 2016, 108.85.134.76 removed the link with edit summary "Undid revision 706999713 by Yaris678 (talk))"

Let's discuss it here.

Yaris678 (talk) 13:59, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

OK. I haven't seen any discussion, so I've brought it back. My reasoning is basically the same as in my earlier edit summary - I don't think adding it was vandalism. PAR is aiming to be the opposite of ivory tower so this is an interesting addition to "see also".

Yaris678 (talk) 09:47, 19 March 2016 (UTC)