Talk:Pantanal

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2019 and 13 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): SjminarikWells. Peer reviewers: Bethymm15.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 06:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Why does the link for the species of cat the Pantanal Cat link here? Surely there should be a page named Pantanal Cat or Pantanal (cat)? Surely this is like Mountain Gorilla being redirected to mountain? – User:Petemella 13:06, 23 January 2007

  • Who knows. Just make the corrections and write a new article. – P199 19:19, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did change the links (albeit to a blank page) and someone changed them back! (Petemella 12:27, 27 January 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Threats...

The "Threats" section of this article seems to be biased and more conjecture / opinion rather than fact. More than half the bullet points do not have references.

The tone of the Pantanal article appears to have a bias. For another style of writing about the human effect on climate / zones, see the "Rainforest" article.

Rather than just unilaterally scrap the "Threats" section perhaps either adding references or removing bullet points without credible references could make the section more objective and factual. Ryan Sinn (talk) 00:07, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • All threats are real! References added. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 17:27, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External Links

One of the (small) local tour operators has added an external link to their tour bookings. Is this in line with wikimedia policy? This seems more a form of advertising than offering any genuine contribution towards readers' knowledge of the region. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bald white guy (talkcontribs) 11:43, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct and I've removed the link. --NeilN talk to me 11:58, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


PDF of Patanal birds - link was broken. (For reference, it was *A Pantanal Bird List - currently server not found) I've added a different bird checklist, but I don't know enough to be sure of its quality. Please upgrade it if you do. Almonaster (talk) 00:36, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Pantanal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:03, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Student Editor Introduction (2019)

Hello! I am a student of a Wetland Ecology class. As a part of a semester long assignment, we are given a few weeks to add as much as we can to a Wikipedia article. I'm hoping to help out in any way I can. For sources, is it okay if some are not accessible to the public, i.e. articles from databases that are accessible through my school such as JSTOR? Thanks so much. SjminarikWells (talk) 17:21, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, off-line and subscription-only sources are acceptable, as long as they are reliable, see WP:SOURCEACCESS and WP:OFFLINE. Regards, -- P 1 9 9   13:31, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Three Brothers River" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Three Brothers River. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 30#Three Brothers River until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:13, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]