Talk:Pakistani Taliban/Archive 3
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 26 April 2023
 | This edit request to Pakistani Taliban has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Per WP:NPOV, we are supposed to include all significant viewpoints in an article. Hence, we should add India as an alleged state supporter of TTP to the infobox, with a note stating that India has denied such allegations. Not only is this connection Pakistan's stated POV[1], but also substantiated by other sources such as Bharat Karnad[2], the UAE per Wikileaks[3] and Pakistani Taliban spokesperson Ehsanullah[4] (the veracity of his statment is confirmed by Karnad)[5] Solblaze (talk) 07:59, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit extended-protected}}template. An addition to the infobox which will lack context is sure to be a contentious change that will require consensus before addition. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:02, 28 April 2023 (UTC)- @ScottishFinnishRadish let's try WP:BRDing this one? I say this because WP:NPOV is a pretty straightforward policy. Solblaze (talk) 09:41, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- It has been discussed previously, with insufficient support for its inclusion. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 10:50, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
- If you're referring to this RFC, not only are the choices in the original RFC a bit poorly worded, but the vast majority of the arguments of those opposing it also boil down to "Pakistan said it so we shouldn't include it" which blatantly violates the very principle of WP:NPOV.
- I don't think our personal biases can override Wikipedia policy. Discarding Pakistan's POV on the issue and taking India's as gospel truth isn't right. Solblaze (talk) 14:32, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reopening this, it's been almost a year with no reply. Solblaze (talk) 07:15, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- It has been discussed previously, with insufficient support for its inclusion. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 10:50, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
- @ScottishFinnishRadish let's try WP:BRDing this one? I say this because WP:NPOV is a pretty straightforward policy. Solblaze (talk) 09:41, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
References
- ^ Sajid, Islamuddin. "Pakistan urges UN to act against India over terror sponsorship". AA.
- ^ Karnad (2017). "Afghanistan, Pakistan and the F-16: Mattis has to hardsell these issues on his visit to India". Hindustan Times.
- ^ Newspaper (2011). "UAE officials suspected India-Taliban link: WikiLeaks". Dawn.
- ^ Hassan, Raza (2017). "India, Afghanistan gave help to Pakistani Taliban, says group's ex-spokesman". Reuters.
- ^ Karnad (2017). "Afghanistan, Pakistan and the F-16: Mattis has to hardsell these issues on his visit to India". Hindustan Times.
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Shadow311 (talk) 16:11, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Shadow311: Add "India (alleged, denied by India)" in the infobox's allies section.
- The plethora of sources in this section can be cited. Solblaze (talk) 12:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 6 August 2023
| This edit request to Pakistani Taliban has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like to edit the opponents and allies of TTP up to date in 2023. Cosmickadet (talk) 20:02, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 20:55, 6 August 2023 (UTC)