Talk:Paduka

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Paduka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090924065657/http://discoverbihar.bih.nic.in:80/pages/gaya1_place.htm to http://discoverbihar.bih.nic.in/pages/gaya1_place.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:28, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Paduka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Replaced archive link http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:MVM36Vl6_hAJ:www.fashionencyclopedia.com/fashion_costume_culture/The-Ancient-World-India/Paduka.html+Paduka&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=in with https://web.archive.org/web/20100202211733/http://www.fashionencyclopedia.com/fashion_costume_culture/The-Ancient-World-India/Paduka.html on http://www.fashionencyclopedia.com/fashion_costume_culture/The-Ancient-World-India/Paduka.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:59, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Paduka pluralization?

Looking for consensus on how "paduka" should be pluralized in standard English. Are they "paduka" or "padukas"? JetJaguar05 (talk) 03:13, 19 June 2020 (UTC)JetJaguar05

Very good question. The short answer is of course that the word itself is not standard English, but that's dodging the issue. I checked the online OED and it is not listed. The first screen of an internet search provides:

• Paduka Sandals who always pluralise "sandal", and never "paduka".
• Yoga-pedia uses "padukas".
• Dolls of India] uses "paduka".
• The site self.gutenberg.org/articles/Paduka (blacklisted by WP) is Project Gutenberg publishing The World Heritage Encyclopedia which simply copies our article!
• Etsy uses "paduka".
• Wiktionary gives the plural as "padukas", yet the quotation uses "paduka".
• Encyclopedia.com uses "padukas".
• Indiasmart uses "paduka".

All I can suggest is decide on a form, ensure that it is used consistently in the article and report it here. You get to standardise English! :-) Martin of Sheffield (talk) 09:10, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

nak tahu buatan mana

buatan tahun bila? 2404:160:802C:CBD5:AA12:E519:C485:89CA (talk) 11:20, 21 March 2022 (UTC)