Talk:PP3

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Astronomy Bottom‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Bottom	This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale.

Big threshold

It's a pity it is not citeable, but the trouble with the program is that it is exceedingly hard to install, especially on Windows (I presume). It generates the wrong thing: PostScript and SVG would be better than generating TeX, which generates EPS, which generates DVI, which generates PDF. There are a lot of advantages, such as ease of use, a Milky Way etc, that will be hard to replace. Rursus dixit. (^mbork³!) 07:30, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categorisation

From the info box: "Type planetarium". However, there is an inline comment in the source: "PP3 is NOT planetarium software, it makes maps. Please do not add that category." Should the info box content be changed? If yes, what should it be?

Talk:PP3

Big threshold

Categorisation

Navigation menu

Search