Talk:Operation Wilno

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Can Refer to Anything?

This is confusing. Can Operation Wilno refer to pudding too? "Operation Wilno" was an invented title to an article. It was established that the title to the 1919 event was pure WP:OR, and therefore changed. The 1944 event also has no basis in being called "Operation Wilno", and it too has been changed to its proper title, Operation Ostra Brama. Dr. Dan 17:00, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it can. No question about it. Just look at those references [1]. LOL. M0RD00R 06:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Please provide sources for Operation Wilno, not any other names. This is how this page is called, so this exact name must be referenced. Otherwise it is OR. M0RD00R 06:16, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As it was number times said - it is simple ORIGINAL RESEARCH.M.K. 11:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Translations are not OR. Plus, see for ex. [2]. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  13:13, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It was distinctly explained on why this article needed to be deleted (talk) regarding the so-called translation. BTW, who is author of this "source", is it an academical page, sef-published? Does it conform to WP:RS? M.K. 15:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What "translation", Piotrus? Wilno translated from Polish gives Vilnius in case anyone forgot. Fact tags were meant to cast doubt at the claim that these events are indeed called Operation Wilno in English language sources. Please give references to those, not to the sources in Polish. You already explained what the Polish name is but this is not the Polish wiki. Oh, and while at it, why did not you add the link to the January Events to your dab list? --Irpen 15:34, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wilno is also used in English publications and is closest to the original naming. Case closed.--Molobo 19:24, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Simply provide the requested citations and the case will indeed be closed.Dr. Dan 22:37, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Case closed indeed: none of the claims can be backed up. -- Matthead discuß!     O       03:04, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • References / sources have already been provided in this entry. So the case is closed now.--NAHID 18:14, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]