Talk:Officer Involved Domestic Violence

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject iconArticles for creation C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This article was accepted from this draft on 22 June 2024 by reviewer TheNuggeteer (talk · contribs).
WikiProject iconCrime and Criminal Biography: Organized crime C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Organized crime task force.

Peer Review Guide

Leave detailed comments, with constructive criticism and suggestions on how to improve here on the talk page. Rudibatzell (talk) 21:15, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Logic: The flow of the article makes sense, with the overall concept being addressed before delving into different legal actions taken in response.

Content: While the content is all really good, the legal aspects can be a bit difficult for the casual reader to follow. For example, the sentence "Furthermore, Sheehan's presentation identified that "if a police officer batters himself his ability to conduct an objective investigation of the problem in other cases, decreases", leading to under-enforcement of domestic violence laws, an underutilization of protective measures, and an increased "risk for use of excessive force"." is a bit complicated to understand with a first read. I appreciate all the content and evidence presented, but some of it just might want to be further explained for the benefit of the reader.

Citations: The citations are well placed within the article itself and each adds to the reader's understanding of the topic. Elizab57 (talk) 16:11, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Article looks good overall, really comprehensive work. I just made a couple of small grammatical changes. I think you are missing a citation at the end of your Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban section, and I would take a second look at your quotations in the 1994 VAWA and Domestic Violence LAPD sections, I think something is off with them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bjurgens14 (talkcontribs) 18:03, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]