Talk:Occupation (protest)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm going to work to try and develop this at some point as I feel it's fairly important, particularly due to recent movements such as Occupy. Thoughts? Mikejamesshaw (talk) 21:13, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Private Property
The whole article is of questionable value, uses inane jargon, and altogether is an attempt to reimagine violence-prone radical protesters as benign. Specifically, though, nowhere does this stream of inanity spell out the fundamental nature of “occupation” as depriving the owners of property their rights. When these occupiers squat somewhere, they are violating the fundamental rights of people to enjoy public spaces, if government owned property, or their own space if privately owned. That should be addressed forthrightly in the lead.
Sych (talk) 20:30, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Start-Class sociology articles
- Low-importance sociology articles
- Start-Class Law enforcement articles
- Low-importance Law enforcement articles
- WikiProject Law Enforcement articles
- Talk pages with comments before the first section