Talk:Nikam
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.maharashtra.gov.in/english/gazetteer/Nasik/005%20History/002%20MediaevalPeriod.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 12:56, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
sitush , i have mentioned my reliable source in the reference column
Kondev (talk) 16:55, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Sourcing
People keep reinstating a poor version of this article. Please note, for example, that this version uses Cunningham as a source (not reliable as it is from the British Raj era) and also a book published by Gyan (see User:Sitush/Common#Gyan). Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 18:09, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 17 October 2016
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please let the content be there. Indian surnames have long histories which are not always documented. So your arguments about source seems invalid. And definitely you people are not an authority on Indian culture or surname histories.
223.196.176.97 (talk) 14:14, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Not done - Arguments about lack of sourcing cannot ever be invalid. Verifiability is one of the core policies, unless something is veridfiable in a reliable source it cannot be included. - Arjayay (talk) 16:31, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
