Talk:New York State Route 323/GA1

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Prose isn't too good. I count nine variations of "intersected" in 10 sentences of the RD. Some awkward wording, as wel.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Ref 5 isn't a RS.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    More info would never hurt.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    No images, but for GA's sake, the infobox map is enough.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

This new review process stinks, but that's besides the point. There are some prose issues which need to be resolved, so I've placed the article on-hold. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 16:41, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, looks better. Passses GA. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 17:34, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/Talk:New_York_State_Route_323/GA1"