Talk:New Jersey Route 70/GA1
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
GA Review
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MWOAP (talk) 22:34, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Review as per Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles
Criteria 1
Done
- Lead Section is way too specific. It gets into article details which are in below text. Review Wikipedia:Lead section (tagged)
- Spelling issue in 1.2 Paragraph 2: "neighborhood" is spelled wrong, simple correction.
- Also, there are dead links. Consider removing.
Criteria 2
Done
- In section one, the last paragraph, first section; I fail to see where citation 5 comes into play. I think that this should just be left with the second sentence.
- In section two, citation 6 fails to provide some reference as to the page number. You might want to contact the person who cited it or remove/recite.
- Citation Eight is not overseen or edited by any authority. Recommend removal of sentence or new citation. Feel free to tell me why this is reliable.
- The information in the source is reliable as it is from annual reports produced by the State of New Jersey. ---Dough4872 01:59, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
- Then, why don't we just link that instead, that way we can also assure that this page will not be altered. My main concern is it says from what we can tell, not assuming a NPOV. --MWOAP (talk) 22:44, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
- There is no specific page for the annual reports, and the information in the current source hasn't changed as it is supposed to be a direct quote of the state. A previous discussion at WP:RS/Noticeboard also stated the source was reliable since it reproduces primary sources. ---Dough4872 01:00, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- Corrected, not an issue any more.
- There is no specific page for the annual reports, and the information in the current source hasn't changed as it is supposed to be a direct quote of the state. A previous discussion at WP:RS/Noticeboard also stated the source was reliable since it reproduces primary sources. ---Dough4872 01:00, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- Then, why don't we just link that instead, that way we can also assure that this page will not be altered. My main concern is it says from what we can tell, not assuming a NPOV. --MWOAP (talk) 22:44, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
- The information in the source is reliable as it is from annual reports produced by the State of New Jersey. ---Dough4872 01:59, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
- Citation Nine has no "convenience link". Provide link.
Criteria 3
Done
Criteria 4
Done
Criteria 5
Done
Criteria 6
Done
Criteria 7
Done
Final Call
Done --MWOAP (talk) 01:53, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Feel free to notify me when these are fixed and I would be happy to redo the review. Also, use my talk page to ask me any questions about this.
- Thanks for the review. I have replied to the above changes. ---Dough4872 01:59, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
- I have skimmed over your edits, looks pretty good, a few more things though. I will look in to it tomorrow (it is late). Also, it is a little hard for me to keep track of these right now, so if you could put the talkback template on the user talk page that would help. Thanks, MWOAP (talk) 03:19, 30 November 2009 (UTC)