Talk:Natural product

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Natural product article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4: 2 years

Natural product was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 23, 2021). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Chemistry High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative medicine

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine articles

Proposal to move the "Biotechnological approaches" section from Secondary metabolite page

I am thinking it would make sense to merge the Biotechnological approaches section from the secondary metabolite page with this article, since this page is more focused on human uses of secondary metabolites. What do you all think? Ethan Bass (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 18:04, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Natural product/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: David Eppstein (talk · contribs) 06:26, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article contains a major cleanup banner that is still relevant (no sources in the final section, "Milestones"), and many [citation needed] tags, some as old as 2014. As such it was not ready for a GA nomination, and mets WP:GAFAIL criterion #3. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:26, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Cheers. (A former contributor and prof.) 73.8.193.28 (talk) 00:32, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Natural product

Proposal to move the "Biotechnological approaches" section from Secondary metabolite page

GA Review

Navigation menu

Search