Talk:NASA Astronaut Group 5/GA1
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 05:26, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- Replace with higher resolution File:NASA_Astronaut_Group_5.jpg higher res
- Any reason not to use this for Brand? S71-51263
- Broken source link File:Gerald P. Carr 2.jpg
- No source link File:William Pogue.jpg
- Any of the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal images should have the scanner credited (e.g., but not limited to, File:Stuart Allen Roosa.jpg)
- No idea what to do here. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 12:03, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- It is a pain in the ass. I wish the uploaders would take care of it. I look in the URL to see what Apollo mission it should be under, which is A14. I navigate to the main journal page, then click Image Library. Then I search for the ID number. In this case, nothing comes up (great!). For some reason the Apollo Archive hosts its images on ALSJ as well. So I go to their image search, put in the ID number, and this time something comes up. In the left column, it says J.L. Pickering, and since they request scanning credit, I add that (and how to find the image, since the filepage should be linked, not a hotlink to the image). You can imagine my frustration after that five-ten minutes of work, when all someone had to do was copy/paste the scanner when they uploaded it :). Could you do the rest of the surface journal images? It is a pain, and I am not sure if we legally have to do it, but they request they be credited as the scanner, and with all the work they have done to provide higher quality images of the Apollo program I figure it is the least I can do. Kees08 (Talk) 01:55, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
- No idea what to do here. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 12:03, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- Licensing and all that is fine
- The descriptions on the file pages are pretty bad/non-existent for most of the images, but that would be going above and beyond for GA (and FA I suppose), but you are free to do it if you have the gumption
- Do you think Worden looks a bit like Mike Rowe?
Through the images (so many images!) Kees08 (Talk) 06:33, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- The best set are the ones of the Next Nine. The photographers managed to capture their personalities. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 12:03, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- Three three There would be three three orbital workshops
- Artifact an artefact
- Uppercase (could you go through and find the rest?) received a bachelor of science degree
- as a joined Lockheed Corporation at a flight test engineer.
- Uppercase earned a master of business administration degree
- Overlink of Columbia STS-35 in the Space Shuttle Columbia in December
- Uppercase then a doctor of philosophy in
- I don't think you need the qualifier, but if you do, it was the first crewed landing, not the first landing was CAPCOM for Apollo 11, the first Moon landing;
- Date formatting On 29 June 1965 he flew
- Should the Jrs have periods? Ronald E. Evans Jr
- Lowercase naval science degree in Naval Science
- Period in 1957 He
- Lowercase physics in Physics from
- Uppercase Doctor of Philosophy his doctor of philosophy degree
- Is spaceflight one word? only space flight
- Should 'the' be here? exposure to the rubella,
- Break this sentence up He flew in space again in June 1982 as commander of STS-4, which carried a classified United States Department of Defense (DOD) payload, in Columbia, and from June 1983 until May 1984, was of the Astronaut Office DOD Support Group, and in January 1985 he commanded STS-51-C, the first classified United States Department of Defense mission, in the Space Shuttle Discovery.
- Fix Borin Boston, Massachusetts,McCandless
- Space politics.In November 1982
- Recovering? Carr was revering from a case
- the most the 24 new astronauts were most that NASA
- Is but the right word here? but Shepard assigned them
- What did? Bit odd to start the paragraph like that. This soon became apparent.
- I was change the to on The Apollo 3, the support
- pp? Shayler & Burgess 2017, p. xxvii, 10.
- You have the dates on the NASA sources in this article, although you said in the other review they are not needed. It does not have to be consistent between articles, just pointing it out in case you forgot to remove them here
- |agency=Associated Press "Astronauts Pogue, Carr Retire". The Indiana Gazette. Indiana, Pennsylvania. August 25, 1975. p. 23 – via Newspapers.com.
- I'm usually pretty forgiving on page ranges, but can you at least break it up to five pages? Would prefer three pages max (depending on the situation, like if there are images etc), just to make verifying information easier Shayler & Burgess 2007, pp. 101–111.
- Is this asterisk supposed to be here? Retrieved July 20, 2010.* Collins,
- Consistent DC/D.C.
- Location? NASA's Scientist Astronauts. Praxis Publishing.
Okay I think I am drifting in to FAC level of review now, I will stop myself. This should be it. Kees08 (Talk) 01:50, 10 August 2019 (UTC)