Talk:Museo del Objeto del Objeto

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The museum of the object of the object

makes sense in English. The translation might mean purpose, but considering the wordplay, why not call it thus? 97.71.73.46 (talk) 03:30, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think I fixed it, leaving a bit of explanation in place. Any objections? __ Just plain Bill (talk) 03:44, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Love locks at the MODO museum

Trivial tradition, can easily be briefly mentioned in main article rather than needing its own article. --Animalparty! (talk) 06:49, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have boldly merged the two articles. --Animalparty! (talk) 18:42, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Museo del Objeto del Objeto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]