Talk:Municipal Waste (band)

Untitled

i was asking about "municipal waste" but the encyclopedia show me about the rock/punk band. i still don't get the information that i need. thank you.

Funny. I was looking for info on the band. I had seen wikipedia before. I am a researcher and have seen the name around. I took it as a trusted source as it hasnt let me down yet. There isn't much info on the net about the band. They don't seem to have a homepage. The description looks good from what I know.

Importance

This band should be here. They are rising quickly within the metal underground and areleading a resurgance in the thrash/crossover genre. As funny and filled with the errors this article is, it captures what the band is about pretty well. I'm going to take some time this weekend to expand it and clean it up. They have released numerous splits and have two albums out. The newest one is their Earache debut. I think that lends weight to their importance. --Aboverepine 16:23, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

concur - they're one of the better known exponents of this subgenre. to illustrate the point, they, and related projects, are mentioned in a prominent metal magazine that i just happened to pick up today. i've seen articles on more obscure bands here. Commander deathguts 04:14, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Concur with the above -- Although I think you should include what magazine, and issue which mentions Municipal Waste. --Pkmugg 21:38, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

It doesn't matter how important the band actually is if the article itself does not make any claims to importance (most of the stuff in the lead could be said about any band anywhere). I've changed {{speedy}} to {{importance}} for now. Please see WP:MUSIC for the guidelines about what belongs in the lead to distinguish this band from all the others we don't include. — Laura Scudder ☎ 00:34, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Municipal Waste - it's actually waste. :-)

This article needs disambiguation and obviously that infers creation of an article on 'municipal waste' rather than this band. Supposed 07:55, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Artofpartying.jpg

Image:Artofpartying.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:50, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Super Sabado Fest.jpg

Image:Super Sabado Fest.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 21:02, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Dark Thoughts - A Tribute to C.O.C..jpg

Image:Dark Thoughts - A Tribute to C.O.C..jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:33, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Crossover Thrash

Is crossover thrash different from usual thrash? As of now, the crossover thrash link in the article redirects to punk metal. Weltanschaunng (talk) 13:19, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Front art of partying.jpg

Image:Front art of partying.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

WE Need to make a template or whatevere the hell you call those things you press at the bottom of the page to see the albums, singles, formaer past memeber,etc. For this band. Come on, four albums out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.138.142.68 (talk) 04:32, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved, and the redirect should be redirected to municipal solid waste (which has already been done). Number 57 16:45, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

---

Municipal Waste (band) → Municipal Waste – Shorter and redirects here anyway. --MASHAUNIX 19:23, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

• Oppose and suggest move: Municipal solid waste → Municipal Waste  or changing Municipal Waste into a redirect to: Municipal solid waste

"municipal solid waste" gets "About 542,000 results"

"municipal waste" -Virginia -Witte -Foresta -Ryan -thrash -Mutation -Partying -Agressive -magician -answer -sentence -chernobyl -feast -reposession -cut gets "About 2,090,000 results" where the minuses are the name of the bands home town, names of members of the band and words out of tracks and videos.

A control search for comparison was as follows

"municipal waste" -Virgini -Witt -Fores -Rya -thras -Mutatio -Partyi -Agressiv -magicia -answe -sentenc -chernoby -feas -reposessio -cu gets "About 3,160,000 results" where the minuses have been slightly minused.

Gregkaye ✍♪ 20:58, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

• I don't know if you already took this into account in your comment, but the nominator doesn't seem to be requesting a move of the band page to Municipal waste, but rather only to Municipal Waste when both terms in the search are capitalized.--Yaksar (let's chat) 02:32, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
• I don't think I had noticed. Similar issues occur with a number of redirects and articles such as, currently, Islamic State and Islamic state. Gregkaye ✍♪ 04:19, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

• Oppose - the caps distinction isn't helpful between a very well known term and a not well known band In ictu oculi (talk) 23:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
• Oppose "Municipal Waste" should eb a disambiguation page. The band, the solid waste article, sewage, and such. -- 65.94.171.225 (talk) 03:51, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
• NOTE for 7 years "Municipal Waste" redirected to "municipal solid waste", it was repointed here this year. -- 65.94.171.225 (talk) 03:53, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Comment: I have changed the hat at Municipal solid waste from:

"Municipal waste" redirects here. For the band, see Municipal Waste.

to

"Municipal waste" redirects here. For the band, see Municipal Waste (band).

and rehashed a disambiguation of sorts at Municipal Waste.

I still favour a move from or a redirect to Municipal solid waste

Gregkaye ✍♪ 04:53, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

I changed to page to a redirect. I see no point in making it a disambiguation/article as it adds no information compared to municipal solid waste and people looking for the band can find a link there.--MASHAUNIX 20:43, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

• Oppose - I'm a fan of creative punk band names. This is a great band name. But this is an obscure band. The common term should direct to Municipal solid waste, which is what an ordinary wikipedia user should expect to find with the term. Trackinfo (talk) 23:18, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.