Talk:Mount Hudson

This article is a current featured article candidate. A featured article should exemplify Wikipedia's best work, and is therefore expected to meet the criteria.
Please feel free to leave comments.
After one of the FAC coordinators promotes the article or archives the nomination, a bot will update the nomination page and article talk page. Do not manually update the {{Article history}} template when the FAC closes.

Mount Hudson has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 5, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Volcanoes High‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mountains Mid‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chile Low‑importance

	Chile portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

A fact from Mount Hudson appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 February 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the volcano Mount Hudson repeatedly depopulated parts of South America?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mount Hudson.

Wikipedia

Aerosols

From what I understand, sulfur dioxide is a gas and as such can not be an aerosol. If this is true, the phrase "sulfur dioxide and other aerosols" suggests the wrong thing. 21:31, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Not only is it a gas; I'm not sure it is particularly soluble in water, nor can it turn into sulphuric acid without a lot of laboratory work. (No that that error was made in this article) Furthermore it is unwise to speculate on the properties of any chemical affect on the ozone after a volcanic eruption until we know more about the process. (I gather an increase in the water content during the SSW (that I believe always occur with eruptions) merely adds to the scarcity of ozone at the poles in the season. Measurement was extremely suspect at that time and certainly any comparison with data until the 1983 satellite data fiasco was resolved can not be accepted.

Weatherlawyer (talk) 20:41, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hudson

Who was the Hudson for which the volcano was named? --DThomsen8 (talk) 14:45, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Francisco Hudson.. Dentren | ^Talk 15:47, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mount Hudson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060117134004/http://volcano.und.edu/vwdocs/frequent_questions/grp7/south_america/question1660.html to http://volcano.und.edu/vwdocs/frequent_questions/grp7/south_america/question1660.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:59, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On the 1991 eruption

I've compiled sources that can be used to write an article on the 1991 eruption[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10106049209354367 ][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34], but in this article I've minimized the coverage as the article is about the volcano in general not just its historic eruptions. And the H1 eruption in the Holocene probably was far more significant than the 1991 one, anyway. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:50, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Going to ask for second opinions on this POV balance tomorrow. JoJo Eumerus mobile (main talk) 21:13, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Given that this article is about the volcano in general and that it has 4,000+ words of readable prose I would suggest creating a separate article for the 1991 eruption. I also think expanding the content about the 1991 eruption in this article might meet WP:UNDUE since there have been more significant eruptions at Mount Hudson earlier in the Holocene. Volcanoguy 20:53, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Volcanoguy. ceranthor 21:00, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For H1 eruption

"CARLOS ASCHERO; DAMIAN BOZZUTO; MARÍA TERESA CIVALERO; MARIANA DE NIGRIS; NATALIA FERNÁNDEZ; NICOLAS MAVEROFF; MARIANA SACCHI Se nos viene la noche. el volcán Hudson y su influencia en el NO de Santa Cruz: integrando perspectivas arqueológicas. Arqueología de la Patagonia: el pasado en las arenas. Lugar: Puerto Madryn; Año: 2019; p. 239 - 249" is accessible via ResearchGate. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:26, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated source on appearance

"Cevo C., J. (1). MANIFESTACIONES VOLCANICAS EN AYSEN (CHILE) ENTRE 1971 Y 1973. Revista Geográfica De América Central, 1(1), 51-74. Recuperado a partir de https://www.revistas.una.ac.cr/index.php/geografica/article/view/2053" may be useful to describe an outdated view on how the volcano looks. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:26, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Passed. Bruxton (talk) 15:09, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mount Hudson/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Bruxton (talk · contribs) 21:16, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review notes

I am happy to review this article. I do enjoy articles on Geography. Bruxton (talk) 21:16, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Items which have been addressed

Lead

all of the elements of the lead are repeated and cited in the article.

One question regarding years. Some years use this format "7,750 BP" and some in the body use "7750 BP". It is inconsistent with others as well. Wondering if it is a mistake?

Aye, it's a mistake, standardized. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling/other

Lead "neighbouring" are we using British English?

Geography and geomorphology "Another name is Cerro de los Ventisqueros" perhaps "another name for the volcano"?

Geography and geomorphology - "Mount Hudson lies in Andes of southern Chile: Missing "the"?

Geography and geomorphology - "Farther south is the 350 kilometres (220 mi) long" "how about "farther south there is a"

Geography and geomorphology "From north to south they are the" consider a comma after "south,"

I don't think that's needed. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Geography and geomorphology "The Huemules Glacier is the largest glacier of Mount Hudson, being 11 kilometres (6.8 mi) long," instead of "being" consider "at"?

I think "being" is fine here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Geography and geomorphology More British spelling "kilometres" consider placing the British english notice

Geography and geomorphology Does "well defined". need a hyphen?

Geography and geomorphology "clockwise from north to south" consider a comma "south,"

I don't think that's necessary here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Geography and geomorphology Should river be capitalized in this context? "Huemules river" it occurs twice in the paragraph.

Capitalized Huemules River. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Geography and geomorphology "but by 1979 had built back up again" consider "it had built up again"

Geology "made up by intrusive rocks" perhaps "made up of"?

Geology "except for the AVZ, where the Antarctic Plate subducts instead" is "instead needed?

Not sure, so removed it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Composition and magma plumbing system "Rocks contain only few" Should we add "a" before few?

Composition and magma plumbing system "The cone lavas includie MORB" misspelling of "include"

Holocene "Pre-caldera outcrops are rate and consist of breccias formed by hyaloclastite" Did you want the word "rate" there?

Holocene "northeastern and southern side of the caldera" Should it be "sides"?

Holocene "occurred 8010 BC" Should we add "in" 8010?

H0 eruption: 17,300-17,440 BP "and like the 1991 AD eruption includes two distinct chemistries" should it be "it included"

Impact on Tierra del Fuego "Impact on human populations in Tierra del Fuego" Should we precede the sentence with the word "The"?

No, in headers I don't think we need it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Impact on Tierra del Fuego "Vertebrates were decimated and large mammals wiped out" should be "were" wiped out.

I dunno, I think the previous "were" carries this sentence. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Impact on Tierra del Fuego "relied on coastal foodsources" food sources" should be two words

H2 eruption: 4200 BP "Unlike the H1 and H3 eruption" should be "eruptions"

H3 eruption: 1991 AD "On August 12, a Plinian eruption formed a 800 metres" is there a mistake before 800 meters?

No, why? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

H3 eruption: 1991 AD "caldera ice and flowed down the Huemules river" Capitalize "River"

H3 eruption: 1991 AD "and people reported problems with breating and eyesight" spelling of "breathing"

Intercontinental spread of ash "arriving there in December,[155] ice cores of East Antarctica" should it be "in" ice cores?

Intercontinental spread of ash "The 1991 eruption of Hudson took place in the same year with the 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo." should it be "Same year as the 1991"?

Other historical activity "On the morning of August 12 1971" might follow 1971 with a comma?

Other historical activity Other historical activity "Huemules river" capitalize River - occurs twice in the paragraph

Hazards "However, as of 2023 the municipal planning of the municipalities on the Chilean side close to the volcano largely ignore volcanic hazards." should it be "ignores"?

Done except as commented. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images

only one image but it is licensed. It is clear and interesting.

Citations

Earwig 8.8% only alerts to long titles.

Geography and geomorphology - it is a difficult check for me because of the language and need to machine translate the foreign language sources. The citations I could check in this section were accurate.

I've seen a recommendation to use this translator, as it's less likely to wank up the syntax than Google Translate. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:55, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Geology "The crust under the volcano is about 30 kilometres (19 mi) thick" Not finding this in the citation #41. Other sources that I spot checked are good.

Hudson volcano has developed on *30-km-thick crust Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Composition and magma plumbing system citations check out

Climate and vegetation citations check out

Eruption history - spot checked - citations check out

Holocene - spot checked -citations check out

Significant eruptions and recent activity - spot checked -citations check out

H0 eruption: 17,300-17,440 BP - spot checked - citations check out

H1 eruption: 7750 BP - spot checked - citations check out

Impact on Tierra del Fuego - spot checked - citations check out

H2 eruption: 4200 BP Is the first sentence is WP:OVERCITEed? Also should we follow MOS:SPELL09? If so the number 6 should be "six"? I have not checked the rest of the article for 0-9 numbers which are not spelled.

I don't remember why all these citations, but the information in the sentence comes from different sources. I've spelled out six there. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

H3 eruption: 1991 AD - spot checked - citations check out

Intercontinental spread of ash - spot checked - citations check out

Other historical activity - spot checked - citations check out

Hazards - spot checked - citations check out

Comments

@Jo-Jo Eumerus:, I am sure the article took an enormous amount of time. It is comprehensive and I have not been able to access certain references but I can AGF. You have brought it from this 678 word article to a 4445 word article. You have an impressive body of work. I think we can wrap this up when you have a look at my final concerns. Bruxton (talk) 01:09, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chart

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Yes
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Yes
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Yes
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Yes
	2c. it contains no original research.	Yes
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Yes
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Yes
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Yes
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Yes
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Yes
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Yes
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Yes
	7. Overall assessment.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Lightburst talk 04:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Mount Hudson volcano repeatedly depopulated parts of South America?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Run (meme)
- Comment: Note that this should be attributed to my main account, Jo-Jo Eumerus

Improved to Good Article status by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk). Nominated by JoJo Eumerus mobile (talk) at 07:26, 6 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Mount Hudson; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

This is ready for DYK. The article is WORTHY, and the fact itself fills the purposes outlined in WP:DYK. As such in my opinion this would be a fine selection for DYK. -Samoht27 22:16, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Added a QPQ. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:19, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]