Talk:Mostly Ghostly: Who Let the Ghosts Out?

Disney Channel Original

Hi, Isn't this a Disney Channel Original Movie?19:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC)GinoKolle (talk)

Budget?

It says the budget for the entire movie was only $300. That sounds a bit unbelievable. This had real actors and was an actual movie, not just some kids goofing around with some old Halloween costumes they got at a garage sale. Dream Focus 10:09, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

I added in the budget; I was able to track it down quite quickly with a little bit of help from Google. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 18:06, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Requested move 18 September 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus, leaning on "no move". The current title is occasionally used and serves as a natural disambiguation, so WP:TITLECHANGES applies. No such user (talk) 09:55, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

---

Mostly Ghostly: Who Let the Ghosts Out? → Mostly Ghostly (film) – The title of this film Mostly Ghostly not Mostly Ghostly: Who Let the Ghosts Out? — it instead appears to be an original research addition for some reason other than actual title accuracy. On more than one occasion now, an anonymous IP has gone around Wikipedia actively breaking links to this article by prematurely rewording them to the correct title despite the fact that it makes them redlinks, so I'm submitting this for discussion on their behalf since they likely don't know how to do it themselves — but if this is going to keep happening, then the title needs to be fixed. 110.159.78.50 (talk) 08:22, 18 September 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 02:00, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

• Oppose. There are already two films called Mostly Ghostly with articles, the other being the sequel Mostly Ghostly: Have You Met My Ghoulfriend?. Instead redirect Mostly Ghostly (film) to Mostly Ghostly (disambiguation). Andrewa (talk) 09:15, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
• Support. This seems to be a similar situation to Star Wars (film). The subtitle was added later to disambiguate from other films, but is not by any means the common name, and the simple moniker still refers primarily to the original film. IMDB calls it Mostly Gostly, and that's what it says on the DVD cover, so seems like a good move.  — Amakuru (talk) 15:13, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
• Comment. A couple of things here. First, there has been some semi-long-term disruptive IP editing involving all of the Mostly Ghostly film and their related (e.g. actor) articles (that I'd prefer Amakuru, as an Admin, be made aware of here...), with cut-and-paste moves, and changing the links away from links to the articles to redlinks (with incorrect titles), and such. Second, in this specific case, it's not so clear cut – while many sources do seem to refer to the film as just Mostly Ghostly, Disney Channel ran it under the title Mostly Ghostly: Who Let the Ghosts Out? when they aired it for their broadcast (IIRC). So, really, I think either version of the title can be argued here. (And, on my end, I'm inclined to leave it where it is under WP:NATURALDIS and WP:TITLECHANGES...) --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:17, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
• Oppose. Google News turns up several hits using this title;[1] even if it was added later, it's convenient natural disambiguation. The article content can make clear what the original title was.--Cúchullain ^t/c 15:37, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.