Talk:More Tuscany

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on More Tuscany. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:24, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article issues and notability

I question the notability of a "group of splinters". Especially when the article states PT joined the New Centre-Right. That article states "was a centre-right (center-right) political party in Italy.", "albeit keeping its own group in the Regional Council ." The article states, "a joint list of Lega Toscana and More Tuscany won 0.6% of the vote" so separating More Tuscany from that "list" might mean a minuscule percentage. -- Otr500 (talk) 13:34, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stub classification

This article was marked as a stub but was as reverted as "not being a stub". The criteria for stub articles can be found at Wikipedia:Stub and this article falls within all those included that justify the classification. For full disclosure, as well as the reasoning for the classification, I left comments on the reverting editor's talk page.