Talk:Monk's Hood

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Dab

Might be good to help people looking for 'monkshood' (the plant) by having a differentiation link on this page. SheRay7 (talk) 15:56, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

done. Disembrangler (talk) 16:00, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of poisonous plant

An editor has placed a picture of "Monk's Hood" plant in the article. While this is clever, this seems WP:OR somehow. Picture wasn't in book unless it was on cover. It seems to open up the way to a lot of embellishment of other fictional (or even factual) book articles by placing pictures that may (or may not) be appropriate. I think it should be deleted. Student7 (talk) 19:52, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is a bit of word play in the book's title, on monk's hood. The ground up root of the plant in the liniment that gets used as a poison in food; the monk's hood that briefly hides the untonsured head of the innocent boy who is the number one suspect for the sergeant; and the overall symbol of the monk's robe that Cadfael wears all the time. The story inspired multiple cover images for the many editions of the book. (use google images to see them all -- one from Harper Collins audio book does put the plant in bloom among the items in the cover image). The author does make a point of using herbs and medicinal plants of that era, accurately. One book discusses the series from the perspective of the herbs, cited in The Cadfael Chronicles. Rob Talbot & Robin Whiteman (1996). Brother Cadfael’s Herb Garden. Little Brown. ISBN 0-8212-2387-9.

Many of the articles on the Cadfael books include images from the Wikipedia Commons to clarify points that are real, not fictional, and integral to the plot, in the section called Setting in History. Images, including maps, are helpful in my view. Prairieplant (talk) 13:07, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1138

This article has been categorized (along with a bunch of others) as occurring in 1138. This is not true and should be rm (with the others). There is (correctly) a category expressly for fiction in the 1130s in which this belongs (and is there). So far, two out of four articles in category "1138" are fictional and did not really occur or even exist, except in the mind of their author and perhaps their readers who (perhaps) suspended their disbelief sufficiently to enjoy it.

The book is construed as being set in 1138. Failing to identify it as fiction (as was done with the other category) is quite misleading. Student7 (talk) 19:26, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that, but not understand why it was done, to add a specific year, when the decade of the story as fiction was already marked. It sounds like the precise year means it is a story written in that year? If I see it again, I will change it, if you have not already caught the error. --Prairieplant (talk) 21:45, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It is out of all the Cadfael Chronicle series, the novels where the year category was added, it is now deleted. --Prairieplant (talk) 22:08, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Monk's Hood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:35, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Monk's Hood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:49, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Monk%27s_Hood"