Talk:Mississippi Highway 489

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mississippi Highway 489/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 420Traveler (talk · contribs) 14:08, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Will review soon. -420Traveler (talk) 14:08, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PlanetJuice: HI just wanted to let you know I started reviewing. -420Traveler (talk) 15:28, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I'll make these changes within the next few days – I am a bit busy now. Also, since the article was nominated for GA, there was some major flooding that damaged the road and received extensive local news coverage. I will assess that at the same time as I make the changes so that any required additions to the History section can be reviewed under the GA nom as well. PlanetJuice (talkcontribs) 02:14, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok sounds good. I'll review history section after you add in the flooding info. -420Traveler (talk) 14:42, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Some changes made. PlanetJuice (talkcontribs) 02:56, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi 420Traveler. Just wanted to let you know that I've finished with the remaining changes and added some info about the flood washout. I really apologize for the delay and understand if you would prefer not to continue with the review given the long length of time since our last discussion. Thanks, PlanetJuice (talkcontribs) 03:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No problem at all, I'll be reviewing the history section later today. -420Traveler (talk) 15:04, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lede

Route description

That works for me. -420Traveler (talk) 15:02, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Works for me -420Traveler (talk) 15:02, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

History

  • Previously, only Mississippi Highway 21 and Mississippi Highway 15 change "Mississippi Highway 21" to MS 21?
Changed both MS 21 and MS 15. PlanetJuice (talkcontribs) 04:21, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • comma after 1965
I offset "in 1965" in commas altogether since I think that is correct. I can make a quick change to just the end comma if needed though. PlanetJuice (talkcontribs) 04:21, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PlanetJuice: sorry for the delay, after this it can pass. -420Traveler (talk) 22:28, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@420Traveler: Changes made. Thank you for the review! PlanetJuice (talkcontribs) 04:21, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk20:48, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by PlanetJuice (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 00:38, 21 December 2022 (UTC).[reply]


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Article is new enough (promoted to GA on 16 Dec) and long enough (RPS is 3002). Earwig didn't turn up with anything concerning and the hook is interesting and cited (preference for ALT0). That hook is a touch repetitive ("Jason Boyd") but I don't think that's a dealbreaker and it could be easily reworded by nom or a prepbuilder if repetition is determined to be too much of an issue. It's not a big enough problem for me to prevent a tick so we're good to go. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 20:27, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]