Talk:Mirror neuron

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Former good article nomineeMirror neuron was a Natural sciences good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 13, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed

Edits required: Language, order, and content

The article (and Social Neuroscience) requires a lot of clean up. The tone is largely informal (using words like "we" etc), the order of sections needs to be addressed (critique should come at the end here), and a lot of the content is out of date/incorrect interpretations of the papers it cites.

I'll start with changing the order around, then move to content. Drthorgithecorgi (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 18:58, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mirror neuron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:56, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Mirror neuron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:17, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anatomical or functional feature?

The article implies, by its presence in the neuroanatomy category and by identifying these cells as special by giving them a distinctive name, that mirror neurons are anatomically different from other neurons. However I am unable to find mention of the anatomic features that would distinguish these cells. That suggests these cells are like others except they happen to be networked as the output cell in the mirror system. If so, shouldn't this be in a neurological category rather than an anatomy category? And if there is no anatomical difference, that fact should be established early in the lead. If there are anatomical differences then I think they should be described early in the article. Jojalozzo (talk) 02:53, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is correct- there is no actual anatomical difference between mirror neurons and other neurons in the brain. It's mostly based on how they react/act (which can be jumbled togther). They're considered a class of neurons rather than a distinct type of neuron because in the brain, it's much hard to classify based on physiology. Spine and peripheral nervous system, yes, but not in the brain. A few links I'll be adding in:
Heyes et al, 2021
Bonini et al, 2022
Schmidt et al, 2021
I'm of the view that calling them mirror neurons is a bit of a misnomer. More recent research argues for the "mirror neuron system" rather than just mirror neurons themselves.
I'll modify the lead. Drthorgithecorgi (talk) 20:09, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Keysers

I have some concerns that Christian Keysers is included multiple times in this article. Although prominent, this user added their research in here multiple times.

User talk:C.m.keysers

I'm thinking we should just remove all of these references as there's a serious conflict of interest. Drthorgithecorgi (talk) 21:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Mirror_neuron"