Talk:Michael Lucas (director)

Uncut?

Is it worth mentioning in the article that even though he is Jewish (or at least of Israeli decent) he is uncircumsized? --98.232.188.173 (talk) 06:10, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

🙏🏿🙏🏿🙏🏿 Nlivataye (talk) 07:55, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Requested move 18 January 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: {{{result}}} ~~~~

---

Michael Lucas (director) → ? – He produced two documentaries, making him a filmmaker. He is also a porn star and a director. I'm thinking "(filmmaker)" may fit this person's role, but we can alternatively use "(entertainer)" if that defines him well. "(actor)" or "(pornographic actor)" neglects the fact that he is also a director; "(director)" obscures the fact that he performs onscreen. George Ho (talk) 19:54, 18 January 2016 (UTC) Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 14:14, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

• @George Ho: Which dab do you prefer? Doesn't seem anyone else cares. Jenks24 (talk) 08:25, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

I'm thinking "filmmaker", but he's also a porn star. Maybe "entertainer"? --George Ho (talk) 19:52, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

• The problem of disambiguation by occupation is that sometimes there is no simple occupation to choose. In these cases, prefer disambiguating by birth year. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:48, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

ie. Michael Lucas (born 1972), which I believe is the default for when no occupation or leading notability association applies. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:33, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

• Oppose any move. I was remaining neutral, but moving this to Michael Lucas (x, born 1972), as suggested above, is non-sense. The fact no one has supported or opposed the proposal in almost a month demostrates this is not broken, and therefore it shouldn't be fixed. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 22:45, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
• Oppose primarily because of the reasons provided by Tbhotch. The current title is stable and concise. Other suggested dabs "filmmaker, actor" would introduce similar problems that "director" has, and the birth year doesn't add much value either. Tiggerjay (talk) 16:31, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

minor event

• Michael Lucas (director)'s missive to all those who share his name: http://gaypornblog.com/michael_lucas_n.html
• Michael Lucas (writer)'s response: https://mwl.io/ego/porn

Arlo James Barnes 09:01, 21 May 2023 (UTC)