Talk:Metaphor and metonymy

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Another completely useless article

For the layperson, it's hard to impossible to decipher gibberish. For the expert... they wouldn't need it or would (if still in school) know better sources/textbooks to consult.

But at least it's oh so correct, yay! --jae (talk) 21:57, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Plus, it needs more information on modern discussions in literary theory, etc. Aristophanes68 (talk) 21:44, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Agree, so added a (1st section) last paragraph for laypersons. My "approximation /" may be more loose than needed. Gherson2 (talk) 15:17, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Metaphor and metonymy

Another completely useless article

Navigation menu

Search