Talk:Merck

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Requested move 3 January 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Jenks24 (talk) 04:48, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Merck → Merck (disambiguation) – To make room for primary topic, per rationale in Talk:Merck KGaA#Title Thkafra (talk) 18:30, 3 January 2016 (UTC) Thkafra (talk) 18:30, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

  • Strong oppose Merck & Co. is clearly the primary topic -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 06:28, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Laughable. Thkafra (talk) 06:37, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • Your claims are laughable. Equating the United States to Monaco? Russia to the Maldives? North America is larger than Europe you know. -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 04:01, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose no primary topic, not in Google Books at least. Suggest early close as malformed. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:18, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, mostly as no evidence is provided and also as malformed multi-page move request. older ≠ wiser 13:41, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The discussion of this malformed multi-page move request is also taking place at Talk:Merck KGaA, and I suggest that it should primarily take place there, since most of the discussion thus far has taken place there. My reasons for opposition are expressed there. —BarrelProof (talk) 17:28, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose: clearly no primary topic, this is what dab pages are for. (As a retired librarian "Merck" means the Merck Index to me, anyway!). PamD 12:45, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. I see no reason that any meaning listed at Merck should be considered the primary topic. Merck should remain a disambiguation page Merck KGaA should not be retitled. -- Ed (Edgar181) 21:34, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Merck"