Talk:Mass fraction (chemistry)

Chemistry Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mathematics Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Merge from Percentage solution

Percentage solution and Mass fraction (chemistry) seem to deal with basically the same topic, and both are way too short to justify forking. A merge perhaps? Mikael Häggström (talk) 15:24, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In general, merging two very short and similar articles makes sense. However, I see a problem here: "Mass fraction" is a well-defined quantity (see IUPAC definition), whereas "percentage solution" seems to be some imprecise term apparently used by biologists. I fear that merging the articles will only increase confusion. I make an alternative suggestion: Convert "percentage solution" into a disambiguation page with 3 entries:

if mass/mass "w/w" is meant, then link to mass fraction (chemistry)
if mass/volume "w/v" is meant, then link to mass concentration (chemistry)
if volume/volume "v/v" is meant, then link to volume concentration

RolfSander (talk) 19:40, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

weight percent terminology

Claiming that the terms "weight percent" or "weight-weight percent" are obsolete ignores the fact that they are quite widely used in industry to refer to mass fraction. While I understand encouraging using true IUPAC nomenclature, the "obsolescence" of these terms should not be mis-represented — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ohenn (talk • contribs) 22:17, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, "obsolete" is wrong. It should be "deprecated".--RolfSander (talk) 13:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mass percentage

Note that mass percentage (also called mass percent) is not the same as mass fraction. They differ by a factor of 100, see "Related quantities".

Regarding the improper name percent concentration, to add to the confusion, take a look at percentage solution.--RolfSander (talk) 07:54, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thats not correct. The do not differ by the factor of 100.

50% = 0.5 So the symbol % just means "divided by 100", as shown in the [article here].— Preceding unsigned comment added by Humanlike2015 (talk • contribs) 15:02, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mixing ratio

The mixing of two pure components can be expressed introducing the (mass)mixing ratio of them $r_{m}={\frac {m_{2}}{m_{1}}}$ . Then the mass fractions of the components will be:

w_{1}={\frac {1}{1+r_{m}}}

w_{2}={\frac {r_{m}}{1+r_{m}}}

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.137.8.113 (talk) 00:09, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The realtion gets rather interesting or non-trivial starting with ternary mixtures.--82.137.8.113 (talk) 00:13, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What do "w/w" and "% w/w" mean?

The redirect w/w redirects to this article, and Percentage solution says to come to this article for an explanation of "% w/w". But I find no explanation of what is meant by these expressions in this article. Does "% w/w" mean the same thing as "wt%"? Is there an explanation somewhere else on Wikipedia? Should an explanation be added to this article?

For example, if a saline solution has a salt content of 20% w/w, is that 20% salt mass per unit of mixed saline solution mass or 20% salt mass per unit of water mass? Assuming it is the former, I just edited the article to say it.

—⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 22:13, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, indeed. Like "wt%", "% w/w" is just another way to (incorrectly) describe mass fraction.

Yes, the denominator refers to solution, not to water. This is already mentioned in the first sentence of the article: "...total mass ... of the mixture...".

--RolfSander (talk) 10:43, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]