Talk:Margarita Ortega (magonist)

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Margarita Ortega (magonist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:32, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Margarita Ortega (magonist)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Blue Rider (talk · contribs) 23:29, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

General

Lead

  • Remove «relatively».
  • The reason why she joined PLM isn't in the body of the article.

Biography

  • Is it known which city/town/village she was born? Edit: I see that source #1 says it isn't.
  • Aye at best you get differing speculations, but none of them seem more accurate than just saying "Sonora".
  • Decapitalize and put in italics «mestizo».
  • Is Pascual Gortari the 1st, 2nd or 3rd husband?
  • How old was Rosaura when she joined the PLM? Or alternatively, add the year she was born in the 1st paragraph.
  • «left her more conservative husband», by husband I assume you mean Pascual (?).
  • Done. --12:58, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
  • How did women played a «a spectacular part in the revolution»?
  • Did they manage to overthrow the goverment of Baja California? Likewise for the capture of Mexicali.
  • There was no "government of Baja California", because it was just a territory at the time. It wasn't admitted as a state, with its own government, until 1952. It's more like the Magonistas captured parts of Baja California during the power vacuum created by the revolution - they captured it from the Porfiriato but it later came under the control of the Maderistas then the Huertistas. --Grnrchst (talk) 12:58, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Who is Ricardo Magón and how does he know she said that to her husband and that she died with a smile on her face??
  • Per some rule of Wikipedia, the quotation needs to have the original text, founded at Espino Becerril 2015, above the translation.
  • The big one, «I love you but...».

Legacy

  • A tad overquoting in this section, no? If possible, rephrase.
  • Who is Benjamin H. Abbott? Perhaps put his their profession.

Stability

  • Last edited on 30 Oct. and no edit wars were recently in place. The article is stable.

Imaged

  • All images have tagged with their copyright status, are relevant and have suitable captions.

Copyvio

  • Earwig's Copyvio Detector points to 24.2% due to quotations.

Sources

  • All citation numbers are from this version. Checked citation #1, #4, #8, #11, #13, #19, #22, #27, #32.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet talk 19:39, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by Grnrchst (talk). Self-nominated at 16:03, 11 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Margarita Ortega (magonist); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • Reviewing this. Congrats on the GA! I personally like ALT1 the best, since it's the shortest and presumes the least prior historical knowledge. The Abbott source checks out. Obviously the article hits the length and quality requirements, and the QPQ checks out as well. Thank you for introducing me to this fascinating figure! - Generalissima (talk) 01:23, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]