Talk:Mahanati/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 20:28, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:28, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• Non-free use rationale looks good.
• Serial comma after Prakash Raj.
  • Fixed.
• That's it here. Lead looks great.
  • Thanks :).

Plot and cast

• 648 words – plot passes WP:FILMPLOT.
• "a year in coma" → "a year in a coma"
  • Fixed.
• Cast looks good but I would use this template instead.
  • Done.

Production

• "researching about the actress" → "researching the actress"
• "more of subconscious" → "more of a subconscious"
• "her take up the role" → "her to take up the role"
• Add a serial comma after "Chennai, Mysore".
• "vitange" might be a typo. Replace it with "vintage".
  • Fixed all.

Themes and influences

• "interview to The Hindu" → "interview with The Hindu"
  • Fixed.
• This section feels kinda short. I would try expanding it.
  • Yeah, I felt the same here. Expanded it a bit, please have a look. -- Ab207 (talk) 09:37, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Music

• Make this a subsection in #Production – (WP:FILMMUSIC).
  • Done.
• "called the album as Meyer's best work till date" → "called the album Meyer's best work to date"
  • Fixed.

Release

• Add a serial comma after Rangasthalam.
  • Fixed.
• "through a different perspective" → "from a different perspective"
  • Fixed.
• #Marketing might need to be removed per WP:TRAILER.
  • Removed mundane detailing, though I'd remove the section entirely if you insist. -- Ab207 (talk) 09:37, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Reception

• "Savitri's story as a" → "Savitri's story a"
  • Fixed.
• "three stars out five" → "three stars out of five"
  • Fixed.
• #Box_office usually goes above #Critical_reception.
  • Done.

Legacy and accolades

• No issues in either of these sections.

References

• Sources are archived.

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·