Talk:Macedonian literature
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Last edits
Vandalism by Laveol? Or not willing to accept the reality. First of all, you are reverting sourced text. Secondly, it is the development that most Macedonists elaborate. Thirdly, nothing to do with BG.--MacedonianBoy (talk) 14:23, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- Remember, you need reliable sources. None were included in the version. What Macedonists elaborate is not a matter for a respectable encyclopaedia if world knowledge and common sense go against it. Where have I said it had anything to do with Bulgaria? --Laveol T 14:28, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- Laveol, obviously you are not familiar with the topic and move your hands from the article. I noticed that you're editing here mechanically by removing each Macedonian edit, but that does not help in building the ency. First of all, the source is quite reliable and I would give more if I did not spend time in amusing you. Blaze Ristoski is a member of MANU and this article that is provided as a reference is published with MANU's approval. --MacedonianBoy (talk) 14:32, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- Where I have mentioned Cleopatra?--MacedonianBoy (talk) 14:34, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- Laveol, obviously you are not familiar with the topic and move your hands from the article. I noticed that you're editing here mechanically by removing each Macedonian edit, but that does not help in building the ency. First of all, the source is quite reliable and I would give more if I did not spend time in amusing you. Blaze Ristoski is a member of MANU and this article that is provided as a reference is published with MANU's approval. --MacedonianBoy (talk) 14:32, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- "As a Ghost", inform yourself before reverting. Nothing is fringe, everything is supported with refs, up to 16 century it is the Macedonian recencion, and from 16 to 19 the new literature (Pejcinovik and the others) and the modern one. Why are you so confused?--MacedonianBoy (talk) 15:21, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- Why do you always have to turn to personal remarks? You know all too well that the references you've provided are not reliable and non-neutral. Do you see anyone going around referencing articles with works by Bozhidar Dimitrov? No. I would personally revert any such nonsense. But you keep on pushing some really odd stuff and keep calling editors names etc. --Laveol T 16:58, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
- Which references suggested by me are not reliable? The ones by Kanchov and the other propaganda guys? No, I put references by people that are really involved in the issue and your problem is the fact that you do not want to accept the reality as it is. That is your problem and I do not care about it, but do not make other people lost their time in chatting with you about banal things and things that are obvious, expect for some circles in BG. I am not removing the BG point of view, and I expect the same from you. --MacedonianBoy (talk) 11:52, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- PS:Who are you comparing Bozidar Dimitrov with? I did not quite get it. Regs.--MacedonianBoy (talk) 11:59, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- It seems to me that people who never identified themselves and their language as Macedonian and even died before the earliest manifestation of Macedonian identities cannot be listed here. Jingiby (talk) 17:28, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- I agree that they shouldn't be listed, since it's not verifiable. However this isn't the only article with this issue, so some cleaning up would be required. By the way, you should move our comments to a new section, since this is an old discussion. StephenMacky1 (talk) 19:56, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- It seems to me that people who never identified themselves and their language as Macedonian and even died before the earliest manifestation of Macedonian identities cannot be listed here. Jingiby (talk) 17:28, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- Why do you always have to turn to personal remarks? You know all too well that the references you've provided are not reliable and non-neutral. Do you see anyone going around referencing articles with works by Bozhidar Dimitrov? No. I would personally revert any such nonsense. But you keep on pushing some really odd stuff and keep calling editors names etc. --Laveol T 16:58, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Macedonian literature. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110218143406/http://cybermacedonia.com/mlanguag.html to http://www.cybermacedonia.com/mlanguag.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:07, 11 January 2018 (UTC)