Talk:MEDCIN

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

shemal

ci quoi une shemal —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.201.219.60 (talkcontribs) 15:26, 18 July 2008

notability

This article needs a few references from medical journal or news articles to show its notability. Please avoid press releases made by the company making the product, except to source statements made by the company about itself, per WP:SELFPUB --Enric Naval (talk) 22:33, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Critical Evaluation

Although this article lacks references, the authors have endeavoured to comply with Wikipedia style and formatting guidelines in respect with bold title heading, clear and concise introductory paragraph to explain the purpose of the subject, and as well providing key concepts linking to other Wikipedia articles. In addition, the article also provided an external link to Medicomp Systems to enable readers to do further research on the subject.

Overall, the information provided in this article is well presented with accurate facts but it can be further improved by including references to support the accuracy and validity of the subject presented.

Referring to the article’s history, it indicates that the content was written in Feb 2007 and since then the article has not been updated with the most recent relevant information.

So as to further enhance and expand the information in this article, the following suggestions for improvement may be considered:

  • Update the article with additional recent information from Medicomp Systems website including recent news articles.
  • Ensure the article is readable and make it as interesting as possible to capture a wider audience.
  • Limit the number of technical jargon to enable readers who are unfamiliar with the subject to follow the article.
  • Provide wikilinks for technical terms.


Daphne Soh (talk) 11:37, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of bibliography

A list of bibliography for my research project on this article would include:

  1. Brown, S.H. (2007). Direct Comparison of MEDCIN® and SNOMED CT® for Representation of a General Medical Evaluation Template. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings. Pg 75–79.
  2. Gasch, A. and Gasch, B. (2010). Successfully Choosing Your EMR : 15 Crucial Decisions. West Sussex,UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  3. Hoyte, R.E., Sutton, M., Yoshihashi, A. (2009). Medical Informatics: Practical Guide for the Healthcare Professional. 3rd edition. lulu.com.
  4. Monegain, B. (2013). Medicomp takes MEDCIN global. Retrieved 19 April, 2013 from http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/medicomp-takes-medcin-global.
  5. Rosenbloom, S.T., Miller, R. A., Johnson, K.B., Elkin, P.L., and Brown, S.H. (2009). A Model for Evaluating Interface Terminologies. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 15(1): 65–76. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2506.
  6. Warnekar, P., Jerome Carter , J. (2003). HIV Terms Coverage by a Commercial Nomenclature. AMIA Symposium Proceedings.
  7. Whittenburg, L. (2012). The CCC system in Medicomp’s point of care knowledge engine (MEDCIN) in Clinical Care Classification (CCC) System Version 2.5, 2nd Edition: User's Guide, Saba, V.K., Springer Publishing.


Daphne Soh (talk) 08:05, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article Improvement Plan (for week 7 wiki assignment checkpoint)

In order to improve and extend the content of this article, the following topics will added in the near future.

  • History
  • Features of MEDCIN
  • Interface with EHR systems
    • Armed Forces Health Longitudinal Technology Application (AHLTA) -- a graphical example of the MEDCIN engine will be provided
    • Clinical Care Classification (CCC) Systems
  • MEDCIN Nursing Plan of Care

Daphne Soh (talk) 11:27, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback

There is good use of references, particularly those from Medcorp. It may be worth seeing if you can incorporate some references from other sources too.

Some things that could perhaps be further qualified in the article are:

  • Is MEDCIN a vocabulary as in a defined set of terms (terminology), or is it a similar to a coding system? I am pretty sure it is a terminology, but this could be further defined in the article.
  • Does the MEDCIN terminology operate on a linear or poly-heirarchy?
  • Is MEDCIN able to be used with applications not developed by Medcorp or is it only for use with the developers products. Conversely, are Medcorp application users locked into using MEDCIN terminology?
  • How does MEDCIN integrate with "most" EHR and legacy systems?
  • In terms of the CCC system, is this a stand alone EHR or EHR module? Good use of a picture for the CCC system.

In terms of the article overall, be careful to steer clear of it becoming an add for Medcorp. The use of additional sources may help with this.

To ensure that the article is in keeping with Wikipedia conventions, you may need to change your heading colour to black.

I hope this is helpful. Sharna Smith (talk) 11:40, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Peer Review- 2

1. Quality of writing

A high standard of spelling and grammar. The article is well structured, objective and easy to read.

2. Use of references

There are a good range of references from a variety of sources. High quality references

3. Content/information

The content has been extensively researched. Clear explanation of the topic. Links to other Wikipedia articles where appropriate.

4. Format/layout

Very good use of headings and sub-headings which gives a very clear layout to the article. An aprropriate font has been used.

5. Improvements Some topics could be extended and further explanations given. For example, the term ICD-10 has been mentioned but there is no explanation for what this term means or a link for further information.

Suzanne Lois Robson (talk) 11:54, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MEDCIN. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:45, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at La Trobe University supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2013 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:22, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]