Talk:Losee v. Clute

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hopefully no copyright vios?

My friend created this case and she violated copyright in doing so. I'm trying to fix it. If you still feel this violates copyright, let me know on my talk page and I'll make a good-faith effort to fix it.Agradman (talk) 21:03, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Was this ripped straight from a westlaw summary? The all caps procedure, facts, holding, style isn't the typical one used for WP law articles. Take a look at Marbury v. Madison for an example. Shadowjams (talk) 21:47, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, no not Westlaw -- what you see here comes from her class notes -- the original copyright violation (expunged) was a quotation from our professor's notes which he posted on the internet.

But I agree that this article is pretty feeble for Wikipedia standards. I will put a "needs wikification" tag on the top. I'm optimistic that this case will get improved by-the-by because it's a law school classic. Agradman (talk) 21:52, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Losee v. Clute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081122083524/http://www.lawrence.edu/fast/boardmaw/Losee_Clute.html to http://www.lawrence.edu/fast/boardmaw/Losee_Clute.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:26, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Losee v. Clute

Hopefully no copyright vios?

External links modified

Navigation menu

Search