Talk:Lorenzo Hubbell Trading Post and Warehouse

April 4, 2014 - Rewrite of entire article

I came across this article and was astonished at the level of misinformation provided by the previous author(s). I searched for several hours until concluding that the original sources were poor and that this was not a well researched topic. I scrapped the entire original article as I could not find one piece of correct factual information aside from Hubbell himself. All of the information I have provided came directly from Us Government websites and is considered fact. If there are any issues please contact me on my talk page. I will be monitoring future updates. Additional sourcing and citations would be greatly appreciated. CircuitChild (talk) 07:49, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Now I see. This article is about the Winslow post. Ganado is a different post. You are welcome to write a different article about it, provided it would be based on reliable sources (apparently, your ability adding reliable sources is still somehow underdeveloped). Next time you are going to write about misinformation, please do your homework first.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:14, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Do not insult me based on what my abilities are and are not. Maybe I spend more time outdoors and doing things with my life than in front of a computer screen. Every article I wrote or contributed to that day is still current except for this one. I am going to re-research this entire topic and revisit this on my own recognizance. Stay tuned for some edits on this page though because this article is poorly written and sourced as it is. CircuitChild (talk) 20:25, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

In the case that I was mistaken, as I review the edits that I made this article is misleading. If there are more than one Lorenzo Hubbell Trading Post then that clarification would need to be made on this article. The research that I did points to this specific post being located in another city. If you were so interested in the topic I have no idea why you didnt just put my information into an additional article yourself instead of delete it CircuitChild (talk) 20:33, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Because you made a mess out of the article and then insulted me. I have no obligation cleaning your mess. Do it yourself please.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:41, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

It is your article. I am not going to disrespect you further by going and rewriting the entire thing. Nor am I going to open the door to be disrespected by rewriting your work that you have done to this article. You were being sassy and uncooperative in trying to help me fix my errors and instead reverted the entire article. May I please have an email address by which to contact you with new resources with which an improved version of this article can be written? CircuitChild (talk) 21:45, 26 May 2014 (UTC)