Talk:Lockheed Martin A2100

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Vtaylor12 (talk) 17:34, 18 May 2013 (UTC) Minor changes to be less "promotional", corrected date of award to match external link information.[reply]

Technical update

I have a few details regarding the A2100 spacecraft from my years with After Columbia Project (no affiliation with Lockheed Martin) that I scrounged up with some publicly available documentation. Why commercial satellite manufacturers are so guarded about such details remains a mystery to me. Featherwinglove (talk) 22:37, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • It is, unfortunately, nothing more than informed speculation, but I do believe that the A2100 and MGS share the same main motor. There is a crap-tonne of information available on the MGS, whose main motor produces 660N of thrust at 315-317sec of Isp with an OFR of 0.85 (the A2100's max load OFR is 0.47, so in the AX configuration, it has a huge surplus of monopropellant hydrazine for orbital operations.) The Sirius 4 spacecraft, as simulated in the Orbiter simulator, is quite easy to fly at the 660N thrust level. I could not find an ion propellant tank for this craft when I searched SSI's catalog (although they do have quite a few for Boeing spacecraft.) Featherwinglove (talk) 00:03, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lockheed Martin A2100. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:26, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]